Please Read

Subscribe to Vintage Mama's Rants by Email
or...
 Subscribe in a reader
Contact Me by Email

VACCINE LIBERATION

Search the Internet


(search Vintage Mama's Rants at the top of the page)

Sponsored Links

Advertise here
Visit Photography by Sandra

Recent Posts

Photography by Sandra

IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT I HAVE TO SAY, THEN WHY ARE YOU HERE?
 Go play in someone else's playground. I don't share my toys here, your comments are spammed and I never see them, and you need to get a hobby.
Photography by Sandra

Blogroll

safebedsharing.org
Sandra Duncan-Stehly | Create Your Badge
Photography by Sandra

Vaccines are NOT required to attend school!

01/02/10

Please understand this:  Every state has philisophical, medical, or religous exemptions (or a combination of all three) that permits your child to attend public schools without his or her vaccinations! 

It’s a myth, it’s a lie – it’s NOT TRUE.

Please check your state’s laws here:  http://www.vaccinetruth.net/

I reside in Ohio, so all I needed to do was write a simple letter: 

Vaccine Refusal Form We, (your names here), give notice to (your city here) City Schools (located in your city/state here) stating that we have chosen not to vaccinate our child, (CHILD’S NAME HERE), because we are philosophically opposed to the concept of vaccines.

 We maintain this is a responsible and ethically justifiable position for the following reasons: 

  • vaccination is a medical intervention performed on a healthy child that has the ability to result in injury or death of that child;
  • the fact that there can be no guarantee that the deliberate introduction of killed or live microorganisms into the body of a healthy child will not compromise the health or cause the death of that child, either immediately or in the future;
  • no predictors have been identified by medical science that can give advance warning that injury or death may occur in any individual child;
  • there are no guarantees that the vaccine will indeed protect the child from contracting a disease; and
  • there is an absence of adequate scientific knowledge regarding the way vaccines singly, or in combination, act in the human body at the cellular and molecular level.  

Therefore, we believe that vaccination is a medical procedure that could reasonably be termed as experimental each time it is performed on a healthy child. 

Our state law makes provisions for non-vaccination of children whose parents object to vaccines for religious or philosophical reasons. 

§3313.671 – Required Immunizations; Exceptions
B.4 A pupil who presents a written statement of the pupil’s parent or guardian in which the parent or guardian objects to the immunization for good cause, including religious convictions, is not required to be immunized. *see attached

 We accept full responsibility for the health of our child, and because of philosophical conviction, do not wish our child vaccinated. In the event of any infectious condition, our child would of course remain at home. We further understand that during the course of an outbreak of any so-called “vaccine preventable disease” would occur at your facility, our child is subject to exclusion from your facility for the duration of the outbreak.

______________________________      ____________  Date 

______________________________      ____________  Date

 

Here is the state law that shows it is acceptable (see item #4 under section B):

http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/

TITLE XXXIII [33] EDUCATION
CHAPTER 3313: BOARDS OF EDUCATION
[SCHOOL YEAR]

ORC Ann. 3313.671 (Anderson 2007)

3313.671 Proof of required immunizations – exceptions.

(A)

(1) Except as otherwise provided in division (B) of this section, no pupil, at the time of initial entry or at the beginning of each school year, to an elementary or high school for which the state board of education prescribes minimum standards pursuant to division (D) of section 3301.07 of the Revised Code, shall be permitted to remain in school for more than fourteen days unless the pupil presents written evidence satisfactory to the person in charge of admission, that the pupil has been immunized by a method of immunization approved by the department of health pursuant to section 3701.13 of the Revised Code against mumps, poliomyelitis, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, rubeola, and rubella or is in the process of being immunized.

(B)

(1) A pupil who has had natural rubeola, and presents a signed statement from the pupil’s parent, guardian, or physician to that effect, is not required to be immunized against rubeola.
(2) A pupil who has had natural mumps, and presents a signed statement from the pupil’s parent, guardian, or physician to that effect, is not required to be immunized against mumps.
(3) A pupil who has had natural chicken pox, and presents a signed statement from the pupil’s parent, guardian, or physician to that effect, is not required to be immunized against chicken pox.
(4) A pupil who presents a written statement of the pupil’s parent or guardian in which the parent or guardian declines to have the pupil immunized for reasons of conscience, including religious convictions, is not required to be immunized.
(5) A child whose physician certifies in writing that such immunization against any disease is medically contraindicated is not required to be immunized against that disease.

Post tags: , , ,

One of the most amazing things I’ve ever seen.

15/01/10

You simply must take 8 minutes of your time to watch. You won’t regret it.

Post tags: ,

Lovely Young Lady pics

14/01/10

As always, the rest of my portfolio can be found at Photography by Sandra!  Thanks for looking!

Post tags: , , ,

Vaccine Education Links

11/01/10

http://www.vaccinationeducation.com/links.html

Mercury & Autism

Vaccine Efficiancy

Vaccine Ingredients

AIDS linked to mass Polio Vaccination

Animal Vaccines

Anthrax Vaccine

Antibodies and Vaccines

Army Vaccines

Asthma & Vaccines

Autism & Vaccines

Chicken Pox Vaccine

Child Abuse (shaken baby syndrome) and Vaccines

Church of Vaccination

Conflict of Interest and Vaccines

Diabetes and Vaccines

DIPHTHERIA (DPT) VACCINE

DPT VACCINE LINKED TO PARALYTIC POLIO

DISEASE THEORY AND VACCINES

EXEMPTIONS/WAIVERS FOR VACCINES

FLU VACCINE

HEPATITIS VACCINE

HOMEOPATHY AND VACCINES

IMMUNE SYSTEM AND VACCINES (autoimmune disorders)

INFORMED CONSENT AND VACCINES

MMR VACCINE (Measles Mumps Rubella)

MMR AND AUTISM

NATUROPATHY AND VACCINATION

POLIO VACCINE

RUBELLA VACCINE

SIDS AND VACCINES (sudden infant death syndrome)

TETANUS VACCINE

THIRD WORLD VACCINES

TUBERCULOSIS AND VACCINES

VACCINE ADVERSE REACTIONS

VACCINE ARTICLES

VACCINE CHALLENGE

VACCINE LINKS (300 Links)

OTHER SITES

International Links in English(US unless stated otherwise)

International Links in other languages

VACCINE PACKAGE INSERTS (pdf files)

VACCINE SITES (GOVERNMENT)

VACCINE BOOK SITES

My vaccine challenge

Post tags: , , ,

Guest Blogger: Does the end REALLY justify the means??

18/12/09

http://midwiferyramblings.blogspot.com/2009/12/does-end-really-justify-means.html

This has come up quite a bit lately. I always seem to come across someone who touts the old line of “I was/did/had _____ and turned out just fine. My child will too.” You can fill this in with “I was formula fed, and turned out just fine.”, or “I was delivered by cesarean, and turned out just fine.”, or any of the other things that are PROVEN to be less healthy for babies. Why do people justify less healthy choices with completely anecdotal ( and often incorrect ) evidence? Unfortunately, it’s much easier to continue with this mindset, than to admit that you could have done better for your child(ren), or yourself.

Science has shown us that breastfeeding is MUCH better for babies. In fact, being mammals, it is the *only* perfect food for our children up to the age of 1. It literally has every single thing that a baby needs to develop a healthy immune system, healthy brain and neurological function, healthy eyesight and coordination, and it reduces the risk of breast cancer for moms. Breastfeeding also deepens the bond between baby and mom, as it allows baby consistent one-on-one time with mom, next to her heart, smelling her skin, feeling her breathe. We are the only mammals who can choose to give our babies formula, filled with preservatives, and second-rate nutrition. And yet we’re considered to be the most intelligent. ;) Now, as frustrating as it is to have to give a disclaimer, for those who choose not to read between the lines here … I am not speaking of the women who are physically UNABLE to breastfeed. Though extremely rare, there are women who are unable to produce milk. However, those are the extreme minority. We have many, many women who simply CHOOSE to give their babies formula, instead of what is best for them. We live in a very selfish society, where it’s perfectly permissible to put yourself ahead in priority over what is best for our children. We see this in pregnancy ( I can eat WHATEVER I want ), labor ( I’m tired of being pregnant, just induce me! ), birth ( I’m not trying to be a hero! Give me DRUGS! ), and then feeding ( I don’t want to have saggy boobs / be the only one who can feed him / have to deal with breastfeeding in public ).

Why aren’t women being held accountable for their second-rate choices? Because it’s not PC to do so. Because women have every right to *kill* their baby in utero, who are we to tell them that they should eat healthy, have a natural birth, and breastfeed? In the meantime, it’s our children who are getting the short end of the stick.

I wonder if women understand what they put their baby through, when they choose an induction, or allow augmentation? Do they understand what the drug does to their system? Do they understand what the artificial strength of pitocin contractions do to their little body? Do women understand that the drugs in the epidural cocktail *do* indeed cross the placenta? Do they care? Even if baby ends up “just fine”, does it negate what women put them through in the name of convenience or choice?

With my first two, the only thing I had right was the breastfeeding. And even then, I didn’t try as hard as I could have with my first. She was only breastfed for 3 1/2 months. I went back to work, and didn’t have a clue how to keep up my milk supply to pump enough for her. I had a completely intervention-filled birth with her. Pitocin, AROM, Stadol, episiotomy ( which I paid dearly for ), and a vacuum extraction. My poor baby was put through hell because of my ignorant choices. My next baby was put through hell as well. An unnecessary, “elective” ( coerced ) cesarean. He wasn’t ready. Because of my ignorant choice, he spent 9 days in the NICU. He was put through so many tests. He had a spinal tap at 30 minutes old, because of 2 seizures. He was given anti-seizure meds, sedation, had tubes running into several parts of his little body. He went through x-rays, ct scans, eegs, and ultrasounds of his head. There was nothing else wrong with him … he just wasn’t ready. I put him through all of that, because I didn’t know any better.

Before anyone thinks that this is written in a superior tone … I want to assure you that it isn’t. It is written out of heartbreak for babies who are put through so much more than they ever should be, or for babies who are given second best. Most because their moms don’t know any better. I wish that there was a way to get information out there, without being labeled anti-choice or superior. What about the babies?

Posted by Christine Fiscer, Traditional Midwife at 10:03 AM   

Post tags: , , ,

Tamiflu anti-viral drug revealed as complete hoax; Roche studies based on scientific fraud

14/12/09

http://www.naturalnews.com/027734_Tamiflu_Roche.html

“…the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention appears to be operating in some alternative universe, where valid science no longer matters to public policy. The agency’s flu recommendations are in lockstep with Roche’s claims that the drug can be life-saving — despite the FDA’s findings and despite the lack of studies to prove such a claim. What’s more, neither the CDC nor the FDA has demanded the types of scientific studies that could definitively determine whether or not the company’s claims are true: that Tamiflu reduces the risk of serious complications and saves lives. Nancy Cox, who heads the CDC’s flu program, told us earlier this year she opposes a placebo-controlled study (in which one half of patients would be given Tamiflu and the other half would be given placebo), because the drug’s benefits are already proven.”

Post tags: , ,

Man At Center of Worldwide 2009 H1N1 Hysteria Under Investigation for Gross Conflict of Interest

12/12/09

http://wisvic.org/ManAtCenter.aspx

World Health Organisation: ‘Mr Swine Flu’ Under Investigation for Gross Conflict of Interest
 
This is out on Google News in lots of European languages.  What are the chances that any major American news sources will pick it up?
 
A German weekly magazine, published in Hamburg. It is one of Europe’s largest weekly magazines with a weekly circulation of more than one million. The Market Oracle
 
Professor Albert Osterhaus, of the Erasmus University in Rotterdam Holland has been named by Dutch media researchers as the person at the center of the worldwide Swine Flu H1N1 Influenza A 2009 pandemic hysteria. Not only is Osterhaus the connecting person in an international network that has been described as the Pharma Mafia, he is THE key advisor to WHO on influenza and is intimately positioned to personally profit from the billions of euros in vaccines allegedly aimed at H1N1.  
 
Earlier this year the Second Chamber of the Netherland Parliament undertook an investigation into alleged conflicts of interest and financial improprieties of the well-known Dr. Osterhaus. Outside Holland and a mention at the time in the Dutch media, the only note of the sensational investigation into Osterhaus’ business affairs came in a tiny note in the respected British magazine, Science.
 
Osterhaus’s credentials and expertise in his field were not in question. What is according to a short report published by the journal Science, are his links to corporate interests that stand to potentially profit from the swine flu pandemic. Science carried the following brief note in its October 16 2009 issue about Osterhaus:  “For the past 6 months, one could barely switch on the television in the Netherlands without seeing the face of famed virus hunter Albert Osterhaus talking about the swine flu pandemic. Or so it has seemed. Osterhaus, who runs an internationally renowned virus lab at Erasmus Medical Center, has been Mr. Flu. But last week, his reputation took a nosedive after it was alleged that he has been stoking pandemic fears to promote his own business interests in vaccine development.  Last week, his reputation took a nosedive after it was alleged that he has been stoking pandemic fears to promote his own business interests in vaccine development. As Science went to press, the Dutch House of Representatives had even slated an emergency debate about the matter.”
 
UN’s H1N1 Scientists Linked to Companies Making Vaccine
WND.com
 
World Health Organization scientists are suspected of accepting secret bribes from vaccine manufacturers to influence the U.N. organization’s H1N1 pandemic declaration, according to Danish and Swedish newspapers.  Meanwhile, pharmaceutical profits from swine-flu related drugs have soared – with earnings between $10 billion and $15 billion in 2009, investment bank JP Morgan estimates.
 
WHO ‘Mr Flu’ Under Investigation for Gross Conflict of Interest
 
Excerpt from Financial Sense article
 
In an interview with Der Spiegel magazine in Germany [a weekly magazine, published in Hamburg. It is one of Europe's largest weekly magazines with a weekly circulation of more than one million] , epidemiologist Dr. Tom Jefferson of the Cochrane Collaboration, an organization of independent scientists evaluating all flu related studies, noted the implications of the privatization of WHO and the commercialization of health:  “one of the extraordinary features of this influenza — and the whole influenza saga — is that there are some people who make predictions year after year, and they get worse and worse. None of them so far have come about, and these people are still there making these predictions. For example, what happened with the bird flu, which was supposed to kill us all? Nothing. But that doesn’t stop these people from always making their predictions. Sometimes you get the feeling that there is a whole industry almost waiting for a pandemic to occur.
SPIEGEL: Who do you mean? The World Health Organization (WHO)?
JEFFERSON: The WHO and public health officials, virologists and the pharmaceutical companies. They’ve built this machine around the impending pandemic. And there’s a lot of money involved, and influence, and careers, and entire institutions! And all it took was one of these influenza viruses to mutate to start the machine grinding… 
 
Is One Man to Blame for the worldwide H1N1 Panic?
Age of Autism
Post tags: , , ,

Christmas 2009 Family Photos…

08/12/09

Post tags: , , , ,

Lovely Family Portraits

25/11/09

 

I have the best job in the whole world.

Post tags: , , , ,

Lovely Senior Portraits…

08/11/09

seniora2

senior2

Post tags: , , , , , ,
« Older Posts — Newer Posts »

Bad Behavior has blocked 80 access attempts in the last 7 days.